For Recommenders

Why Recommendations Matter

Recommendations are a core part of almost any fellowship application, and recommenders play a significant role in 1) affirming information that applicants say about themselves, 2) providing context, background, and details that applicants aren't able to provide, and 3) speaking from the perspective of their academic discipline or professional field. 

Recommendations are taken very seriously both at the campus level -- when we are making decisions about endorsements and nominations, or for the endowed Dartmouth postgraduate grants -- and at the national level. 

The Fellowships Office is happy to provide feedback or guidance on recommendations, especially if you are new to writing for a particular fellowship. Reach out to fellowships.office@dartmouth.edu. 

 

Good Practice in Recommendations

General guidelines for strong fellowship recommendations:

  • If the fellowship asks for letters, we generally recommend 1.5-2 pages single-spaced. National fellowships appreciate longer letters that give a clear sense of the applicant as a unique individual. 
  • Write to the criteria of the fellowship rather than providing an exclusively academic or generic recommendation. Some fellowships are specifically looking for leadership, public service, creativity, social impact, etc. This may mean that you write a recommendation differently, depending on the fellowship, than you would for a grad school letter. 
  • Speak with the applicant about their narrative and how they are planning to present themselves in their application. The applicant should provide you with whatever information helps to understand their narrative, including copies of their resume/CV and essay drafts. 
  • Be specific. Examples leave a stronger impression and demonstrate personal knowledge. This might include quoting from previous feedback on an assignment, relating a specific anecdote, or relaying a conversation you've had with the applicant. 
  • Provide context for how you know the applicant and for what length of time. 
  • Situate the applicant's performance and/or character traits in the larger context of your field and experience. 
  • Be candid but not negative. National organizations are looking for realistic evaluations rather than unsupported positivity. 

Try to avoid the following:

  • Recommendations that are too short, too vague, and give few specifics. 
  • Generic letters or letters that have been too quickly adapted from other purposes (for grad school admissions, for example)
  • Recommendations that merely summarize information found elsewhere in the application (i.e., on their transcript or CV/resume)
  • Recommendations that evaluate the applicant as mediocre or average. If this would be your evaluation, it would be better not to agree to write the recommendation. 

 

Campus Deadlines

We have campus deadlines for many fellowships where we need to interview applicants and/or make decisions about endorsement/nomination. In those cases, the applicant should share with you the campus deadline for submission, since we use your recommendations to make decisions. In many cases, once an applicant is nominated/endorsed, we are able to upload the recommendation for you. In other cases, you might need to submit it twice: once to us for the campus review and once to the national organization. We recognize this is not ideal, but we have no other mechanism in those cases for including your recommendations as part of the applicant's file. 

The expandable boxes below provide more detail on some of the most common fellowship cycles and their requirements for recommendations.